“America the Conservative”

So last night I tried really hard to write a post explaining how there needed to be two victories, one at the level of reality (being elected president) and one at the level of the symbolic. The latter ought to be understood in good-old Maoist terms as how we should “properly think” of this victory: what is its meaning? The forces of the Right, predicting a McCain defeat for some time, have already been mustering the resources to try and make it seem, as ridiculous as it sounds to those on the Left, that an Obama victory somehow “proves” the notion that America is a “conservative nation” at heart, whatever that means.

Anyhow, here is a great graphic David Sirota made over at Open Left, juxtaposing Newsweek’s most recent cover with the electoral map from last night:

Here’s a progressive take on the meaning of the victory.

(Via Matthew Yglesias.)

Taking It to the Streets

Posted at 3:26 AM

People are so happy with the election results that they’re marching through the streets here in Ann Arbor. I just ran from E. William St. to State St. on Central Campus. Probably over a thousand people marching and cheering for Obama. Apparently the rally is moving towards City Hall now, near Kerry Town. It’s really amazing. I haven’t seen anything like this since I went to the big D.C. Peace Rally in 2004 to protest against the Iraq War, but even that was really mixed. This is definitely something different.

The Meaning of an Obama Victory

Posted at 12:31 AM

Apologies for this post—the spirit here in Ann Arbor is one of optimism and, particularly, drunkenness. It’s comfortable for us to congratulate ourselves on an Obama victory, on a world-historical moment in American history, but the path for a truly progressive victory has not yet achieved itself. The next struggle will be one over the actual “meaning” of this victory: what does it mean that Obama has won? The Right will try and convert this Obama victory into an argument that American is, essentially speaking, a “center-right country.” It is up to the Left to appropriately engage in the struggle over this meaning, over what Hegel refers to as “objective Spirit.” The true struggle is before us, the next four years is open, despite being electorally settled tonight.

The far-Right insinuations of a vote for Obama being a vote for “socialism” already suggest a path for how the Left might confront this kind of a confrontation over the true “meaning” of an Obama victory: if Obama is “truly” a “socialist,” as the Right contends, then the meaning of an Obama victory is that American has officially condoned “socialism.”

An electoral victory is only the first step towards a truly progressive platform for the U.S.

Obama is the President

Posted at 12:17 AM

About ten months ago I was having dinner in Glasgow, Scotland. After the waiter realized my girlfriend and I were American, he asked us what we thought of the election. We told him we were Obama supporters. He told us that Obama will never be elected. “A black man will never be president in America. I like Ron Paul, though.” I just have to laugh.

Theme Time Blog Post: Elections, Part 1

Posted at 3:09 AM

Okay Wonkette, I see your election day theme time musical jamboree and offer more election music for your consideration.

First, Hank Williams, the father of the football guy, sings to us. Singing about You’re Gonna Change (Or I’m Gonna Leave), because who can’t agree with that?

Next, let’s go with Lie To Me by Tom Waits, because, MY FRIENDS, YES WE CAN have federally financed enemas, fancy Neiman’s jackets and balance the budget, too.

And of course John Zorn’s magical Ballad of Hank John McCain, because an angry man goes blind and knocks his head against the wall.

For the undecided voter, some inspiration from Scott Walker’s 30 Century Man.

Pipe Wrench Fight

YouTube goes Situationist.

Fight the Future

Screw the Economist’s “bold choice” to strike out against the grain by “daringly” choosing to endorse Secret Muslim candidate Barry Hussein “Bomber” Obama less than a week before the election. Wonkette’s editor-in-chief, Ken Layne, has just endorsed John McCain for President. Great stuff. (Via Wonkette.)

Patti Smith in Paris

I’ve had this article sitting minimized in my dock for a day now, and I just got around to reading it. Turns out Paris has both Patti Smith and David Lynch. We need to get them back. If there was a better reason to try to restore America’s reputation on the world stage, I can’t think of it.

The lights are turned up and the empty bar suddenly becomes busy. ‘Let’s see where we can go,’ says Smith. She suggests her ‘small and messy’ hotel room and we head for the lift. From behind a pillar someone tries to get her attention. ‘Hey, Patti! It’s David!’ And there’s the American film director David Lynch, with a smart black suit and a magnificent silver quiff, beaming. ‘How you doing, Patti?’ She smiles. ‘I’ve got a hell of a headache. It’s nice to see you. You look terrific.’ He is excited about the series of concerts she will be giving, starting the following night at one of the oldest churches in Paris, Saint-Germain-des-Prés. ‘It’s cool. I’ll see you there, Patti. Rock on.’

From Midwest to M.T.A., Pain From Global Gamble

Probably one of the best New York Times pieces I’ve read in a long time. The story is about global capitalism and the financial crisis, but what makes it interesting is that they chose to look at how two incredibly discrete cases, five Wisconsin school boards and the New York City M.T.A., were mutually impacted by risky loans from the same Irish bank. As they write:

The trail through Wisconsin, New York and Europe illustrates how this financial crisis has moved around the world so fast, why it is so hard to tame, and why cities, schools and many other institutions will probably struggle for years.

It’s one of those things that’s hard to believe. Given the incredibly “virtual” nature of our present stage of late capitalism, it’s striking to see the various ways in which the chaotic movement of capital, its restlessness and self-destruction, can actually harm people’s lives in very concrete ways, particularly people and/or entities that did not intend to engage in the kind of risk that they found themselves in as a result of capital’s constant ebb-and-flow between wealth creation and wealth destruction.

I wonder if we can even imagine what it would be like if Bush’s social security reform had passed.

(Via A Tiny Revolution.)

Jokerman done in a riff-rock style. Pretty cool stuff.

How… what?

NY Times Book Review: “Revolution in Mind”

A new book on Freud that sounds interesting, although the review is somewhat mixed. The author is George Makari, whom I’ve never heard of before, but apparently he’s the director of Cornell University’s Institute for the History of Psychiatry, although I’ve never heard of that either. Anyhow this bit sounded interesting:

In “Revolution in Mind,” Makari argues that we’ve been blinded to the cultural reach of psychoanalysis by the magnitude of Freud’s stature and the magnetic pull or repulsion of his personality and theories. In Makari’s view, much contemporary discussion about the relevance of psychoanalysis is based on a false choice: “Freud as everlasting genius, or Freud as relic and fraud.” To Makari, the director of Cornell University’s Institute for the History of Psychiatry, this dichotomy is artificial. Instead, he argues, we should look to the rich, polyphonous context that gave birth to and was influenced by the analytic enterprise: “the culture of Kant; the assumptions of Geisteswissenschaft and a European classical education,” along with “evolutionary biology, positivism and Newtonian physics.”

Sounds similar to what I’m trying to do with my own thesis on Lacan.

It’s a Springsteen Halloween

Bruce Springstreen has come out with a Halloween song and accompanying video. Featuring the tale of the fabled cryptid known as the Jersey Devil. Scarier still, you can even download it for free.