It’s Time To End “The Office”

A Posts entry from Wednesday, October 29, 2008

10:14 PM

From Ricky Gervais’ website, Kyle Carpenter critiques the US Office for straying too far from the British original.

For the most part, the American Office has departed so far from the British version that the two can barely be thought of as the same show. One major pitfall is that some of the main characters in the American version are vastly different from their portrayal in the British one. For example, Carrell’s role as Michael Scott is, at best, an overblown parody of the bumbling British boss David Brent. The real loss is that Gervais’s style of subtle comedic delivery throughout the series has been abandoned. Instead, Carrell’s jokes are over the top and spoon-fed to the American audience.

Another prominent character that was spoiled in the American version is the role of the slightly neurotic wimp Gareth Keenan. Mackenzie Crook’s role as Gareth was turned into Dwight Shrute, portrayed by Rainn Wilson. Wilson’s role is so over-acted and unbelievable that he comes across more like a villain from a little kid’s show than a character in a comedy that is supposed to be funny because of how realistic it is. This brings me to the fundamental difference between the two shows. Although a stretch at times, the British version feels like it could be a real workplace, and the characters are humorous in their authenticity. In the American version, the characters are larger than life, and often find themselves in unrealistic situations. While some viewers see this as part of the show’s charm, it entirely undermines the original premise of the series.

From its high in the second season, I think the US Office has been in steady decline. I don’t watch a lot of TV, but I’ve been following the US show using torrents since the begining. Before I begin my critique I should say that I’m not a television writer and I don’t know anything about the television industry or what it takes to make a show, I’m just offering my opinions as a fan.

I believe that the US Office needs to close. For the sake of the show’s integrity, it needs to give itself a strong final push and plot arc and try to end on a high note.

It’s still “funny” but it’s not “funny and challenging”. It came close a few times, but now it’s way off the mark. The UK Office was consistently funny and challenging. Each scene was well-crafted and extremely well acted. It played with fourth walls, left things unsaid and was willing to deliver tragedy.

One problem is the lead character. I hadn’t realized this before Carpenter pointed it out, but Ricky Gervais’ performance as David Brent was a great moment in acting. It was funny, subtle, completely alienating and yet totally sympathetic. Steve Carrell is funny, and he’s a great actor as we saw in Little Miss Sunshine, but the increasingly broad material and irreconcilable idiocy of his character give him very little wiggle room.

There is no emotional risk for the characters. The continuation of the franchise depends on their consistency. Of course the indicted executive Ryan returns as a secretary. Of course Jim comes back from another branch, just as Jan came back, just as Dwight came back from working at Staples. Just as Pam will come back from art school and Toby will return from Costa Rica (wait a few weeks, Amy Ryan’s contract is not a permanent deal).

Even when the characters are flung out and pushed away they always return to a paper company in the middle of nowhere. Why? They are free of consequences and reality. The show tried to take risks but never followed through. It’s a comedy cock tease.

I believe that with some firm guidance from Merchant and Gervais the show could finish in style instead of lingering and fading into Two and a Half Men with no laugh track. Merchant and Gervais need to reign in the NBC/US creative team. I hope that this is what Gervais was hinting at by posting the link to the Carpenter critique on his website. At the very least, someone should send the NBC team a copy of the original Office on DVD.

Of course ending the show at this point would mean taking risks, telling off the network and killing a cash cow. But they need to ask themselves: Do they want to make great comedy, or do they want to sell some fucking candles?

As Carpenter said, “the last good thing about the British version is that it knew when to die with dignity.”

EDIT: The November 6th episode was a great accomplishment, probably the best one in the last two seasons. Maybe I’ve been hyper critical…

5 Comments

David

I agree with you that it hit its stride in season 2 with its first truly original scripts (the initial run was merely Americanized scripts from series 1). Ever since I’ve kept a wandering eye, watching it sing its long, American swan song. I’ve always admired the British series format of six episodes per season (or series) and a usually brief run of total series at that. It begs careful planning, and lets great comedy work within greater emotional arcs, such as in The Office and Extras. I also admire Garth Merenghi’s Darkplace, The Mighty Boosh and Nathan Barley as limited series. Modern British shows leave you wanting more, while most all American shows stay out well past their shelf date. Although, it does lend itself to masterpieces like 24…

Mark Elliot Cullen

I was thinking the same thing. Lately I’ve just been blown away by all the talent coming out of Britain. Gervais and Merchant, The Mighty Boosh, Russell Brand, and Sasha Cohen, they’re all phenomenal. I also really enjoy Simon Pegg, Jonathan Ross and Mitchell and Webb.

My main source of media is the internet, so It could just be that I tend to follow the great cult shows, but I feel like British comedy is definitely going through a golden age. Then again, isn’t The Vicar of Dibley still on the air?

Bryan Klausmeyer

One obvious problem is that the BBC is a publicly run broadcasting group: since it’s state-sponsored I imagine pressure from advertisers is far less and so it’s much better suited for really creative work. On the other hand, as you said yourself, NBC isn’t going to kill a highly lucrative show just because the writers might want to make it into anything other than that. If it comes down to that, they can just fire the writers and get new ones (although I wonder to what degree Gervais has influence over this).

There have been some great American sitcoms, but it seems that for largely structural reasons they just can’t end well: they have to be milked until every last drop is gone and finally they’re so empty and devoid of any substance they keel over in the Nielson ratings and die a pathetic death.

My other complaint with the US Office is that it totally loses the edginess of the UK version: what makes the UK version great is that it shows how idiotic office work actually is and that the boss is not a guy you “wanna have a drink with.” On the other hand the US Office says that your boss, even though he is stupidly, is ultimately a lovable buffoon who somehow always redeems himself. It also makes the “office” seem like a great, fun place filled with attractive and crazy people.

Shane

Utter horse shit.

Mark Elliot Cullen

Thanks, Shane! I hadn’t thought of it that way.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

Respond

Required

Required