A Letter To Drug War Supporters: What Are You Smoking?

A Posts entry from Thursday, April 3, 2008

12:44 AM

Here’s a letter I just wrote to the Michigan Daily concerning U.S. Drug Policy. I don’t know if it will or should be published, but either that’s why I’m putting it here. By the way, Hash Bash at Michigan is sort of a joke now-a-days, it really deters from anything resembling a social or political movement—it is nothing but a peanut gallery display for undergraduates to “experience” while they wait for their six-figure jobs. Anyway…

Regardless of whether Hash Bash is held this year on the Diag, the discourse over the continuation of America’s failed drug policy, exemplified by the War on Drugs, should be critically evaluated by every U.S. citizen. Both Michigan and the United States as a whole are facing economic and fiscal problems with no clear solutions in sight, and yet we continue to spend vast amounts of tax dollars to pursue policies that are proven failures. The War on Drugs is nothing but a financial blackhole. Billions are spent annually domestically and abroad to reduce the production and distribution of controlled substances with little success to show for it. In fact, the Drug War under the reign of George W. Bush has actually led to a two-fold increase in cocaine production worldwide.

The benefits of ending the War on Drugs and fully decriminalizing marijuana far outweigh the supposed consequences of their existence—this view point does not call for the decriminalization of more severe drugs such as cocaine, crack-cocaine, heroin, and METH. According to an estimate taken in 2000, prior to an increase in spending under the current administration, the federal government alone spent roughly 19 billion dollars annually on the War on Drugs—this number increases drastically when you factor in spending on drug enforcement across the country by local and state governments. Just consider the many ways that our governments could be using this money instead. For example, a city/state restoration fund could be established to finance renovations in struggling areas across the country (think Detroit or New Orleans…or Michigan in general for that matter). The money could also be re-routed to assist overburdened government programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security; it could be spent on public education, humanitarian work in third-world countries, investing in alternative energy sources, increasing student loans or Pell-grants, and renovating our crumbling infrastructure. Oh, and don’t forget our never-ending adventure in Iraq.

The damage caused to this country by the Drug War is not limited solely to the fiscal realm, it affects the lives of hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens every year. According to the New York Times, about 800,000 people are arrested annually for possession of marijuana, with an outrageous majority receiving criminal charges for possessing meager amounts of marijuana. Having such charges on peoples’ records can prevent them from receiving higher-paying jobs (this hurts employment rates and consumer spending) and can even result in the revoking of one’s right to vote in certain states. The right to vote is the essence of our governmental system and should not be revoked under any circumstances, otherwise how will those who are wronged by the system have the opportunity to amend it?

Given Michigan’s dismal economy and budget problems, I’m surprised at the astonishing lack of practicality displayed by Michigan’s state representatives. It is going to take innovative solutions to bring Michigan back to national prominence, so here is one to consider: Full legalization of hemp and marijuana within the state of Michigan. The United States is the only industrialized country in the world to make hemp production illegal. Growing hemp would provide Michigan farmers with a versatile product that can be used in a wide variety of products. I’m not implying that legalizing hemp would be the “cure-all” for Michigan’s problems, in fact it would have only a tiny impact on Michigan’s overall economic situation, however, to be blunt, any step forward would be a good step right now. Legalizing marijuana would have a much more positive impact on the state of Michigan and our nation as a whole. Legalization holds a two-fold benefit: 1) the state saves money by redirecting law enforcement efforts towards more grievous crimes, which in turn saves money by reducing processing costs within the legal system that arise from mandatory sentencing and 2) the state can earn money by selling growing licenses to individuals and by placing a tax on the selling of marijuana by companies—if you do not think pharmaceutical companies would like to sell “dank” strands of marijuana to high-end consumers, you just might be taking a hard drug like METH.

Enough is enough. Both Michigan and the United States are going to have to wake up to the economic and fiscal realities they are facing. We have too many problems that need to be addressed and properly funded to be wasting billions of dollars annually on policies that give no return on investment except to certain weapons contractors. And please, don’t cling to the “moral” argument that marijuana is illegal because it is bad for you. There are roughly 16,000 alcohol related deaths and even more cases of tobacco related deaths due to lung cancer, and yet these substances are legal when there has never been a single recorded death due to marijuana. America became great because of its innovation, I hope it does not continue its fall from grace because it desperately clings to out-dated and irrational polices beautifully clad in the cloth of “moral superiority”.

Jeff May is a sophomore and thoroughly enjoys getting stoned off his ass.

Share

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • Google
  • Mixx
  • 2 Comments

    Bryan Klausmeyer

    No offense Jeff, this is well written and everything, but it seems like a topic better suited for, well, high school. This is because it is a very easy debate to win. Why is this? Because there is no rational justification for the policy and rational, scientific, utilitarian thinking is usually the one that is first learned and most common to us.

    The point of the state banning the sale of drugs is, however, not necessarily a rational one, as you’ve rightly pointed out, and as pretty much every pro-drug reform person points out. There is the dimension of productivity involved, but I think, generally speaking, the biggest point is that the way authority constitutes itself is not on some rational or logical law, but on a sadistic act of scission. This is what, in essence, all law is. It presupposes guilt, so, for instance, when the state bans the use of certain drugs, we as citizens are already presumed guilty as having had a desire to use them, which incurs obedience.

    This is the point that drug reform advocates miss: the state’s authority is constituted upon its irrational violence. Reform will not change this, because if it isn’t drugs, it is something else. This is why it isn’t enough to use this as some sort of “stepping stone” to some hypothetical freedom “tomorrow.” What is needed is some sort of Benjaminian “divine violence”:

    Bryan Klausmeyer wrote:

    [I]f mythical violence brings at once guilt and retribution, divine power only expiates; if the former threatens, the latter strikes; if the former is bloody, the latter is lethal without spilling blood.

    …It strikes privileged Levites, strikes them without warning, without threat, and does not stop short of annihilation. But in annihilating it also expiates, and a deep connection between the lack of bloodshed and the expiatory character of this violence is unmistakable. For blood is the symbol of mere life. The dissolution of legal violence stems, as cannot be shown here, from the guilt of more natural life, which consigns the living, innocent and unhappy, to a retribution that ‘expiates’ the guilt of mere life—and doubtless also purifies the guilty, not of guilt, however, but of law. For with mere life the rule of law over the living ceases. Mythical violence is bloody power over mere life for its own sake, divine violence pure power over all life for the sake of the living.

    Again, I’m not against drug reform, but it’s a single issue movement (which is why it always makes various appeals, appeals to the Constitution, appeals to freedom, appeals to rationality, appeals to the economy, etc.). We should be going beyond that at this point.

    Gregg May

    Well if it is better suited for high school, at least i can use it.

    I enjoyed the points made

    Trackbacks & Pingbacks

    Respond

    Required

    Required